...
This document expands upon Introduction to Accounting in Finflux and describes the default accounting associated with Non Performing Assets when accrual accounting is associated with them
...
If a payment is made for the entire accrued amounts, that is for a total of 340, the accounting entries generated would be as follows
Event | GL Account | Debit | Credit |
---|---|---|---|
Payment of Interest, Fees and Penalties | Fund Source | 340 | |
Interest Receivable | 300 | ||
Fee receivable | 30 | ||
Penalty receivable | 10 | ||
Recovery of Interest Accruals in suspense | Liability due to Non Receipt of Interest from loans in NPA | 300 | |
Income from Interest | 300 | ||
Recovery of Fee Accruals in suspense | Liability due to Non Receipt of Fees from loans in NPA | 30 | |
Income from Fees | 30 | ||
Recovery of Penalty Accruals in suspense | Liability due to Non Receipt of Penalties from loans in NPA | 10 | |
Income from Penalties | 10 |
Alternate scenario : Write-off on the 16th of March
...
If a write-off is made for the entire accrued amounts on the NPA loan, that is for a total of 340, the accounting entries generated would reverse any balances in suspense accounts
Event | GL Account | Debit | Credit |
---|---|---|---|
Write-off of Interest, Fees and Penalties | Liability due to Non Receipt of Interest from loans in NPA | 300 | |
Liability due to Non Receipt of Fees from loans in NPA | 30 | ||
Liability due to Non Receipt of Penalties from loans in NPA | 10 | ||
Interest Receivable | 300 | ||
Fee receivable | 30 | ||
Penalty receivable | 10 |
Note that if this loan was not in an NPA status, the accounting entries would have debited an expense account instead instead of reversing "Suspense" income accounts, i.e
...